HOME  /  Industries  /  Metals-to-Plastics

Lighter. Cheaper. Quieter. Often stronger. Almost always  faster to market.

Modern engineering plastics — glass-filled nylons, polycarbonate alloys, high-temp polysulfones — match or exceed the strength-to-weight performance of cast aluminum, stamped steel, and machined zinc in a wide range of applications. We help you redesign, validate, and re-source the part.

01 When it makes sense

Five conditions where conversion  pays.

— Weight reduction is on your spec sheet.

Drone, aerospace, mobile equipment, automotive aftermarket — every gram saved compounds across the system

— The metal version is over-engineered for its actual load case.

Many parts inherit "metal" from legacy design, not because metal is required

— You're paying for secondary work.

Machining, deburring, painting, anodizing, or coating that an as-molded plastic part skips entirely

— Corrosion or galvanic issues plague the metal version.

Plastic doesn't rust, doesn't pit, doesn't conduct, and doesn't react with what's around it

— Volumes are above ~5,000 units annually.

The tooling investment amortizes; piece price drops below the metal alternative

02 How we approach it

A four-phase path. 8 to 14 weeks.

Most conversion projects move from first conversation to first production parts in this window. Faster is possible when the part is small or simple.

01

Free 30-minute design review

Bring us the original metal print, sample, or both. Our engineers review the part, discuss the load case, and tell you whether conversion is realistic. If it isn't, we'll say so on the call.

02

Moldflow analysis & resin recommendation

Once conversion looks viable, we run Moldflow on the candidate geometry and resin. Output: a documented recommendation with stress analysis, fill simulation, and trade-off discussion.

03

Prototype tool and part validation

Soft tooling for 50–500 prototype parts. You validate function, fit, and field performance. We refine the design based on what you learn.

04

Production tooling and run

Hard tooling sized to your actual annual volume. First-article inspection, dimensional sign-off, and into the rotation.

03 What you can expect

The actual trade-offs.

What gets better

Weight: typical 50–70% reduction
Piece cost at scale: 20–60% reduction
Cycle time: net positive (no secondary ops)
Corrosion resistance: full elimination
Acoustic damping: improved
Design freedom: integrated features, undercuts, snap-fits

What you give up

Up-front tooling investment
Maximum operating temperature in some grades
UV degradation in unstabilized resins
Regulatory re-qualification in some industries
Some specific load cases (high-cycle fatigue, extreme abrasion)
04 Resins we use most

The toolkit for replacing metal.

33% glass-filled nylon 6/6

— the closest plastic equivalent to die-cast aluminum for many structural parts

Long-glass-fiber nylon

— for parts replacing stamped steel where impact resistance matters

Polycarbonate

— for cosmetic and impact-critical parts replacing thin metal stampings

PEEK and high-temp polymers

— when the application sees 200°C+ continuous service

Polysulfone

— for parts requiring repeated steam sterilization

Acetal (POM)

— for low-friction mechanical parts replacing machined zinc or brass

Got a metal part that's costing too much?

Send us the print and a sample. The 30-minute design review is free, and we’ll tell you in plain English whether conversion is worth your time.